<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>microclesia &#187; Paradox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.microclesia.com/?feed=rss2&#038;cat=29" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.microclesia.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 12:34:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Mosque</title>
		<link>http://www.microclesia.com/?p=1708</link>
		<comments>http://www.microclesia.com/?p=1708#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 00:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inclusivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paradox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sociology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ground zero]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[islamic community center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mosque]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microclesia.com/?p=1708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &#8220;Ground Zero mosque&#8221; presents moral dilemmas for both those who want to build the mosque and those who want to prevent it. Those who oppose the mosque undermine Constitutional liberties and reduce our law-based ideals to something not much different than any common brute-force, tyrannical state.
That said&#8230;. a large majority of U.S. citizens oppose [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Ground Zero mosque&#8221; presents moral dilemmas for <em>both</em> those who want to build the mosque and those who want to prevent it. Those who oppose the mosque undermine Constitutional liberties and reduce our law-based ideals to something not much different than any common brute-force, tyrannical state.</p>
<p>That said&#8230;. a <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h4SNS96buBBfRlg2yUUHh7PVHeAAD9HLV4FG0"><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">large</span></strong></a> <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h4SNS96buBBfRlg2yUUHh7PVHeAAD9HLV4FG0"><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">majority</span></strong></a> of U.S. citizens oppose the mosque.</p>
<p>This reality poses a moral dilemma to the promoters of the Islamic center. What kind of insensitivity would ignore a large majority (<span style="text-decoration: line-through;">63%</span> 72%) of their neighbors who have asked you to relocate your project to another part of the city?</p>
<p>Those who oppose the mosque are clearly out of step with the inalienable values of this country. Yet for the mosque developers to go ahead with their building plans near Ground Zero would only insult the vast majority of their neighbors, thus undermining any intentions of &#8220;good will&#8221; they claim to bring.</p>
<p>The mosque developers have a<em> tremendous opportunity</em> to capitulate with generosity and charity towards their neighbors by building in another part of that great city. In doing so, Muslim faith would be shown to the USA in a most transcendent manner. But to build in the face of overwhelming opposition (regardless of that opposition&#8217;s moral standing) would simply add fuel to the collective fire of religious fear and mistrust &#8212; something this world does not need.</p>
<p>If I were a Muslim proposing to build the community center, I would use this international media platform to show Islam as a religion of peace and reconciliation that makes every effort to love and get along with its neighbors, even when those neighbors can be real jerks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.microclesia.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1708</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chosen</title>
		<link>http://www.microclesia.com/?p=1432</link>
		<comments>http://www.microclesia.com/?p=1432#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 14:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ecclesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Inclusivity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paradox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Poetry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Betsy Johnson-Mille]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microclesia.com/?p=1432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some people will be chosen
for the job, the Wednesday night poker game
for the limited number of spaces
available in heaven. Only so many
spoons fit in one drawer your mother
would say
and the same is true for clothes
and closets
shelves and cans and let&#8217;s be honest
hearts and loves.
I cannot love you because I love another
is a problem
that sometimes gets [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: right;">Some people will be chosen<br />
for the job, the Wednesday night poker game</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">for the limited number of spaces<br />
available in heaven. Only so many</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">spoons fit in one drawer your mother<br />
would say</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">and the same is true for clothes<br />
and closets</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">shelves and cans and let&#8217;s be honest<br />
hearts and loves.</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">I cannot love you because I love another<br />
is a problem</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">that sometimes gets admitted<br />
over wine</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">in a restaurant<br />
filled with people choosing</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">this dish over that meat<br />
choosing something that will fill</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">the middle of their beings<br />
or leave them slavering like a cheetah</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">who missed and pass that<br />
would you? and let&#8217;s be friends. Yes</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">let&#8217;s drink to being friends<br />
and then we can all go on our way</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">remembering the best part<br />
about being chosen is that</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">you do not have to stop<br />
for anyone along the way.</p>
<p style="text-align: right;">- Betsy Johnson-Mille</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.microclesia.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1432</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Absolutely Convinced or Radically Uncertain?</title>
		<link>http://www.microclesia.com/?p=1088</link>
		<comments>http://www.microclesia.com/?p=1088#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 05:29:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Awe & Mystery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paradox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Transition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[μυστικός]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Absolutes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Certainty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Morgan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Doubt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Faith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phillip Clayton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rollo May]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uncertainty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microclesia.com/?p=1088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good thoughts this week from J. Brink and P. Fromont (vis Rollo May) on the slippery notion of  ideological and religious certainty.
Brink quotes philosopher Philip Clayton,
“The days are gone when we can just list the doctrines…mother church can decide and we can just sit there with those as a given.  Given is no longer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good thoughts this week from J. <span style="color: #800080;"><strong><a href="http://jonathanbrink.com/2009/12/14/radical-uncertainty/" target="_blank">Brink</a></strong></span> and P. <span style="color: #800080;"><strong><a href="http://prodigal.typepad.com/prodigal_kiwi/2009/12/a-paradox-of-courage-doubt-1.html" target="_blank">Fromont</a></strong></span> (vis Rollo May) on the slippery notion of  ideological and religious certainty.</p>
<p>Brink quotes philosopher Philip <span style="color: #800080;"><strong><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3tIM-x3FcZ4">Clayton</a></strong></span>,</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>“The days are gone when we can just list the doctrines…mother church can decide and we can just sit there with those as a given.  Given is no longer a given. And I think there is an attitude of radical uncertainty and radical doubt.  And rather than saying can we integrate doubt and faith, I want to speak of a faith which incorporates the radical doubt, which is the doubting miraculously finding faith within it.”</strong></p>
<p>Clayton articulates an important shift:  a faith not built upon persuasive propositions (if you&#8217;ve not heard<em> </em> a better argument, you&#8217;ve not talked to the right people) but upon wrestling with life&#8217;s mystery and paradox. Faith <em>born</em> <em>of </em>deep probing doubt. Faith that exists in harmony with doubt, not in opposition to it.</p>
<p>Fromont quotes existential psychologist Rollo <span style="color: #800080;"><strong><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rollo_May" target="_blank">May,</a></strong></span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: black;">“…People who claim to be <em>absolutely</em> convinced that their stand is the only right one are dangerous. Such conviction is the essence not only dogmatism, but of its more destructive cousin, fanaticism. <strong>It blocks the user from learning new truth, <span style="color: #0000ff;">and is a dead giveaway of unconscious doubt</span></strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">…</span>”</span></strong></p>
<p>Pretty obvious stuff, but so often lost in the passion of religious fervor:  absolute certainty as a marker of toxic religion &#8211; a posture of certainty that snuffs out the <em>small voice</em> of creation &#8211; a rigidity of mental logic that that bounds and gags the transcendent freedoms of Spirit.</p>
<p>May concludes,</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>“…The person with the courage to believe and at the same time to admit his doubts <em>is flexible and open to new learning</em>, and I’d add, open to new depths of meaning and new vantage points from which to gain new or different perspectives. Commitment </strong><strong>is healthiest when it is not <em>without </em>doubt, but <em>in spite </em>of doubt. To believe fully and at the same moment to have doubts is not at all a contradiction: [rather]<span style="color: #0000ff;"> it presupposes a greater respect for truth</span>, an awareness that truth always goes beyond anything that can be said or done at any given moment…” </strong></p>
<p>When discussing religion and spirituality, I prefer the word &#8220;confidence&#8221; over certainty. And sometimes &#8220;confidence&#8221; is too strong a word.<em> Hope,</em> however, is never too strong.  A shared hope is always welcome in any community. Hope is a bridge <em>between</em> communities. Hope promotes inclusion and safety. Hope lives on, even in the face of death. Hope is the yeast of faith.</p>
<p>As new generations accelerate and deepen the shift from institution-centric, lay-clergy models of religion to networked sharing and collaboration &#8212; what Duke theologian David <span style="color: #800080;"><strong><a title="Amazon" href="http://www.amazon.com/Key-Words-Religion-Media-Culture/dp/0415448638" target="_blank">Morgan</a></strong></span> calls an <em>extended community of interpretation</em> &#8212; theology will change, perhaps radically. And among the major changes will be the way we <em>collectively</em> re-imagine and re-envision our certainties, confidence, hope, and faith.</p>
<p>As this collective re-imagining transforms religion from the inside-out, from the bottom-up, from expert to amateur&#8230; may it not coalesce into yet another static propositional confession. May doubt (the posture of honest uncertainty)  remain authentic and always new &#8211; and not become a religion unto itself. May religion be continually redefined as (re)generative, inclusive, shared experience, offering a depth of freedom not found in ideas, but in what the best ideas always point to. Inertial. Pointing father. Pointing beyond the visible horizon.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">One of the 20th century&#8217;s greatest scientific thinkers, Nobel Prize winning physicist Richard Feynman, talks about faith, doubt, religion, and uncertainty in this engaging four-minute film. Time well spent.</p>
<p style="text-align: left; padding-left: 30px;"><strong>&#8220;I think it&#8217;s much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers that could be wrong&#8230; I don&#8217;t <em>have</em> to have an answer; I don&#8217;t feel frightened by not knowing things.&#8221;</strong> &#8211; R. Feynman</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/zeCHiUe1et0&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/zeCHiUe1et0&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.microclesia.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=1088</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Poets and Prophets</title>
		<link>http://www.microclesia.com/?p=860</link>
		<comments>http://www.microclesia.com/?p=860#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 18:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art & Creativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aspire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Awe & Mystery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecclesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paradox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[μυστικός]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microclesia.com/?p=860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Author Jeremy Bouma is live blogging Peter Rollins at a conference. This is very inspirational material that elevates Spirit over religious systematics. I find Peter&#8217;s manner of  questioning and wrestling to be deeply authentic, reflecting the very God-given creativity, curiosity, and wonderment we are all given as children, but so often smother as adults.  See [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Author Jeremy Bouma is live blogging Peter Rollins at a <a href="http://www.novuslumen.net/poets-prophets-and-preachers-tuesday" target="_blank"><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">conference</span></strong></a>. This is very inspirational material that elevates Spirit over religious systematics. I find Peter&#8217;s manner of  questioning and wrestling to be deeply authentic, reflecting the very God-given creativity, curiosity, and wonderment we are all given as children, but so often smother as adults.  See also Trent&#8217;s <a href="http://morphinelife.com/?p=402" target="_blank"><strong><span style="color: #0000ff;">heart-felt invitation</span></strong></a> echoing this same unbridled desire to really <em>be</em> who we were created to be, to move unrestricted in that same natural optimistic flow and stream which created all things &#8211; the cry of those painfully aware of how we compromise and commandere (a.k.a., religion, superstition) this perennial Gift.</p>
<p>From Jeremy&#8217;s pen (excuse syntax &#8211; this is live blogging &#8211; ital mine):</p>
<p>christianity is fundamentally violent…against the principalities and powers. Mother Theresa and Martin Luther King ruptured the systems. System is not that which you see, but that which you see through…these people doing something powerful.</p>
<p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 10px; padding-left: 0px; margin: 0px;">Revelation not about revealing. We think revealing…God whispering in the year. A theologian talks about God like a biologist talking about bio-life.<strong> </strong><em><strong>The question is not is Christianity true, but what does it mean when it claims to be true</strong></em><strong>…</strong>we then just assume its like the truth of biology. <em><strong>Revelation does not mean we have information about God</strong></em>, like a biologist has something on bio-life.</p>
<p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 10px; padding-left: 0px; margin: 0px;">The desire to speak of God is ancient. If you can name God you can have power. But is this idea of NAMING something that God plays along with? Possible to exist in reality and so majestic that it cant exist in the mind. God not anonymous. He is hypernonymous…don’t know something because there isnt access. God is not unknown because he doesn’t exist; he cannot be known because he cannot be grasped because of the excess…like the sun.</p>
<p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 10px; padding-left: 0px; margin: 0px;">The Bible is divine because of the tension and problems and difficulties. Of course you are going to have a breakdown of words when you have the infinite entering into the finite. Of course we are going to blow up and combust.</p>
<p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 10px; padding-left: 0px; margin: 0px;"><strong><em>The unnamable is omninamable…when confronted with the trauma of God not reduced into silence, but into poetry, prophecy, and preaching. As soon as you name God you create him in your image. Theology is like us trying to draw God. Jesus tears up our images of God, not paint them. As soon as we start putting words to God peoples God’s look like them…God is not the patch of meaning on the wind of our unknowing…he is the patch of unknowing we put on our wind of meaning.</em></strong></p>
<p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 10px; padding-left: 0px; margin: 0px;">Moses…Jacob wanted to know God’s name. But he didnt give it. We dont name God, he names us.</p>
<p style="padding-top: 0px; padding-right: 0px; padding-bottom: 10px; padding-left: 0px; margin: 0px;"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><strong><em>The point of incarnation is not God being revealed and we now understand it…its now the mystery is here and brought among us and lives with it. The mystery is deepened. The mystery touches us.</em></strong></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.microclesia.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=860</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oxymoronica</title>
		<link>http://www.microclesia.com/?p=210</link>
		<comments>http://www.microclesia.com/?p=210#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:22:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Art & Creativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paradox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.microclesia.com/?p=210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With a HT to KK, and in continuing the theme of an earlier post in which John Fiesole playfully tackles the notion of meaningful meaninglessness, and the meaningfullnessians who profess such paradox, here&#8217;s a book exploring uncaused causes &#8211; self-causation &#8211; seemingly illogical or nonsensical ideas that, upon deeper reflection, may offer  profound truth. From [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a HT to <a href="http://www.kk.org/thetechnium/archives/2007/10/holy_technology.php" title="KK" target="_blank">KK</a>, and in continuing the theme of an earlier post in which John Fiesole playfully tackles the notion of meaningful meaninglessness, and the <a href="http://www.microclesia.com/?p=205" title="Faith">meaningfullnessians</a> who profess such paradox, here&#8217;s a <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0060536993/ref=nosim/kkorg-20" title="Oxymoronica" target="_blank">book</a> exploring uncaused causes &#8211; self-causation &#8211; seemingly illogical or nonsensical ideas that, upon deeper reflection, may offer  profound truth. From the book:</p>
<p>The superfluous is the most necessary.<br />
Voltaire</p>
<p>Always remember that you are absolutely unique. Just like everyone else.<br />
Margaret Mead</p>
<p>I shut my eyes in order to see.<br />
Paul Gauguin</p>
<p>We learn from history that we do not learn from history.<br />
Georg Hegel</p>
<p>We are never prepared for what we expect.<br />
James Michener</p>
<p>To be believed, make the truth unbelievable.<br />
Napoleon Bonaparte</p>
<p>What we really want is for things to remain the same but get better.<br />
Sydney J. Harris</p>
<p>When a dog runs at you, whistle for him.<br />
Henry David Thoreau</p>
<p>Always be sincere, even if you don&#8217;t mean it.<br />
Harry S. Truman</p>
<p>Man can believe the impossible, but can never believe the improbable.<br />
Oscar Wilde</p>
<p>War is a series of catastrophes which result in a victory.<br />
Georges Clemenceau</p>
<p>First I dream my painting, then I paint my dream.<br />
Vincent van Gogh</p>
<p>We are confronted by insurmountable opportunities.<br />
Walt Kelly, From Pogo</p>
<p>I want peace and I&#8217;m willing to fight for it.<br />
Harry S. Truman</p>
<p>Study the past, if you would divine the future.<br />
Confucius, in Analects</p>
<p>Love is a kind of warfare.<br />
Ovid</p>
<p>All works of art should begin&#8230;at the end.<br />
Edgar Allan Poe</p>
<p>and my favorite&#8230;</p>
<p>The final delusion is the belief that one has lost all delusions.<br />
Maurice Chapelain</p>
<p>no wait, this is my favorite&#8230;</p>
<p>A man chases a woman until she catches him.<br />
Anonymous</p>
<p><a href="http://www.microclesia.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/paradox.jpg" title="paradox.jpg"></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.microclesia.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/paradox.jpg" alt="paradox.jpg" /></p>
<p></a><strong><a href="http://www.microclesia.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/11/paradox.jpg" title="paradox.jpg"></p>
<p style="text-align: center">The Kandelhardt Paradox</p>
<p></a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.microclesia.com/?feed=rss2&amp;p=210</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
